[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Roadmap section on IO related features

I created https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7003 that adds a first version.

I included planned connectors mentioned in [1] that currently has an owner assigned to this section. Did not include connectors that have already been completed and connectors for which corresponding JIRAs do not have an owner assigned.


On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:52 AM Chamikara Jayalath <chamikara@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 for using the term connectors.

JB, thanks for agreeing to add content to this section. 

- Cham

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:48 PM Ahmet Altay <altay@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I like this idea and also the first option. I agree with making it clear that things about IO are language specific.

And +1 to calling it connectors or anything else that will resonate with end users.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Agree, I think connector is a more meaning name for users.

IO is more the Beam "internal" wording.

I will update this section as I have new connectors ( :) ) on the fly.


On 26/10/2018 04:49, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> My $0.02
> "IO" has an established meaning in Beam dev argot but I think on the web
> page I would use the word "connector" or something more universal.
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:39 PM Chamikara Jayalath <chamikara@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:chamikara@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>     (1) Add a top level IO roadmap.
> I like this, but it is important on the roadmap to be very clear about
> language / SDK.
>     (2) Add IO roadmap sub-sections under each SDK instead of at top level.
> This seems OK to me too. If you are a user and you have some data you
> just want to see if it is going to be accessible to you soon. You
> probably already committed to a language.
>     (3) We don't need a IO roadmap since we already have
>     https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/built-in/
> I think the roadmap / in-progress part should move to the new Roadmap
> and/or the wiki.
> Kenn
>     WDYT ?
>     Thanks,
>     Cham
>     ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>     From: *Chamikara Jayalath* <notifications@xxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:notifications@xxxxxxxxxx>>
>     Date: Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:07 PM
>     Subject: Re: [apache/beam] [Website] Add roadmap at top level (#6718)
>     To: apache/beam <beam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:beam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>     Cc: Chamikara Jayalath <chamikara@xxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:chamikara@xxxxxxxxxx>>, Your activity
>     <your_activity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:your_activity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>     Ok. Makes sense. Kenn and others, WDYT ? We can start writing down a
>     roadmap for IO if there's no objection. It can include more details
>     about some of the proposed IO mentioned in
>     https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/built-in/ as well as
>     information on upcoming major IO related efforts such as
>     cross-language IO support and SDF (in addition to what will be
>     available in portability roadmap for these features).
>     —
>     You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
>     Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6718#issuecomment-433262537>,
>     or mute the thread
>     <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKUZEUcsbL6bhjOfeRiNZmqtab3PDWBjks5uom5KgaJpZM4Xj9s1>.