[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: valid NaNs versus invalid NaNs?

>> Anyhow, it seems worth addressing this gap at the written specification level.
> What would you suggest? We could add a statement to be explicit that no special / sentinel values (which includes NaN) are recognized as null.

I like your suggestion Wes.  Please consider making that amendment (or similar) in the next specification update.