osdir.com


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Making a bugfix 0.11.1 release


Looks like I need
https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/274237cfd396a8cb3424c12ef75e7267e0480cb9.
I'll cherry-pick that into the maint branch and start making a new RC
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 4:55 PM Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I created 0.11.1 RC0 but verification (verify-release-candidate.sh
> source 0.11.1 0) fails with
>
> + export GI_TYPELIB_PATH=/tmp/arrow-0.11.1.Cpdsj/install/lib/girepository-1.0:
> + GI_TYPELIB_PATH=/tmp/arrow-0.11.1.Cpdsj/install/lib/girepository-1.0:
> + bundle --version
> Bundler version 1.16.5
> + bundle install --path vendor/bundle
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could not locate Gemfile
> + cleanup
> + rm -fr /tmp/arrow-0.11.1.Cpdsj
>
> @Kou -- what should I do?
>
> Thanks
> Wes
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 2:16 PM Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I'm working on the source release now. We need to try to determine the
> > cause of the spurious RAT errors:
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/wesm/490dc50c494cc914ae28b4fd897a73eb
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:27 AM Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Seems that Travis CI builds are triggering Appveyor builds, so things
> > > show up as failed
> > >
> > > https://github.com/wesm/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=build-8
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:18 AM Uwe L. Korn <uwelk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have triggered the wheel builds on my crossbow repo with build-25, feel free to use them.
> > > >
> > > > Uwe
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> > > > > I'm having problems with Crossbow. I am going to try a few things
> > > > > (going through the setup process "from scratch" -- new tokens, new
> > > > > local repositories, etc.) but if I can't figure it out today, a
> > > > > different PMC with a working Crossbow setup may need to cut the
> > > > > release candidate artifacts
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:48 AM Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I prepared the maintenance branch here
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/maint-0.11.x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not fully set up with to create a release candidate yet with
> > > > > > Crossbow but I'll work on it today and try to get a vote started by
> > > > > > EOD
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 3:45 AM Antoine Pitrou <antoine@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would recommend cherry-picking a minimal number of patches for the
> > > > > > > bugfix and for packaging to work.  It's better not to include API
> > > > > > > additions or changes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Antoine.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Le 17/10/2018 à 03:32, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > > > > > > > hi folks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As a result of ARROW-3514, we need to release new Python packages
> > > > > > > > quite urgently since major functionality (Parquet writing on many
> > > > > > > > Linux platforms) is broken out of the box
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/66d9a30a26e1659d9e992037339515e59a6ae518
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We have a couple options:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > * Release from master
> > > > > > > > * Release 0.11.0 + minimum patches to include the ARROW-3514 fix and
> > > > > > > > any follow up patches to fix packaging
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is the option to "not" release but it could cause confusion for
> > > > > > > > people because PyPI does not allow replacing wheels; a new version
> > > > > > > > number has to be created.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What would folks like to do? Who can help with the RM duties? Since a
> > > > > > > > 72 hour vote is a _should_ rather than _must_, we could reasonably
> > > > > > > > close the release vote in < 72 hours and push out packages faster if
> > > > > > > > it is scope limited to the zlib bug fix
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Wes
> > > > > > > >