osdir.com


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation


This is a topic that bears discussion but I don't think it's related to
whether we accept this donation of IP into the Apache project. Let's
discuss that separately.

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 12:39 PM Antoine Pitrou <antoine@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Le 11/10/2018 à 12:34, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > hi Antoine -- this is C# .NET, not C++.
>
> That is what I understood.  My question was whether we want to continue
> gathering all independent implementations (I'm assuming the .NET
> implementation doesn't rely on the C++ libs?) in a single repo.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
>
>  So this is a new
> > implementation to stand alongside the other languages in the repo at
> > present. I would hope that we can eventually add C# integration tests
> > to the integration test matrix.
> >
> > - Wes
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:12 AM Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> If it's an independent implementation, does it make sense to integrate
> >> it in the current C++ Arrow repository?  AFAIK, the main point is to
> >> run integration tests.  On the other hand, it doesn't scale very well
> >> to integrate all implementations in a single repo.
> >>
> >> It could still be under the Apache Arrow umbrella, but under its own
> >> repository.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Antoine.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:26:22 -0400
> >> Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Do others have some opinions about this? I think it would be great to
> >>> bring in folks from the .NET community. Since there is also a Parquet
> >>> .NET library available (https://github.com/elastacloud/parquet-dotnet)
> >>> there may be some interesting collaborations.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Wes
> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson
> >>> <cshutchinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I planned on contributing long term in an open-source capacity
> separate from my employer, but I imagine spending professional time as our
> product evolves. I don't have an Apache ID at the moment; I also forgot to
> include that in my ICLA, although I specified in my submission to the
> secretary the ID(s) I prefer.
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Wes McKinney [mailto:wesmckinn@xxxxxxxxx]
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:04 PM
> >>>> To: dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Subject: Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation
> >>>>
> >>>> hi Christopher,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to
> continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Wes
> >>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson <
> cshutchinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has
> developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We are
> donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The source
> code is available for review on GitHub:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave
> issues on GitHub, and happy voting!
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
>