[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RESULT] [VOTE] Combining Arrow C++ development process with Apache Parquet C++


With 5 binding +1 vote, the motion carries.

I have prepared a rebased version of the merge with the commit history
preserved, while files unrelated to the primary Parquet source tree
have been excised with git filter-branch

https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/2453

There are some things in apache/parquet-cpp that have been left behind
by this surgery, but I think we can address them in follow up patches,
and this maintains > 95% of the code history that is valuable for `git
blame` purposes.

I need to do a bit of work to get this integrated with our CI, but I
would like some feedback on this so we can be prepared to pull the
trigger in the coming days.

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:43 AM Uwe L. Korn <uwelk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, at 12:53 AM, Phillip Cloud wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 6:26 PM Jacques Nadeau <jacques@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:21 PM Philipp Moritz <pcmoritz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for the monorepo plan and push access to Parquet C++ committers
> > > >
> > > > -- Philipp.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Antoine Pitrou <antoine@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 from me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Antoine.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Le 21/08/2018 à 18:49, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > > > > > hi folks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As discussed on the Arrow and Parquet mailing lists ([1]) and
> > > resolved
> > > > > > by vote on the Parquet mailing list ([2]), we are proposing to
> > > develop
> > > > > > the Arrow and Parquet C++ libraries out of the apache/arrow git
> > > > > > repository, while continuing to create separate Parquet C++ releases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In order to make this work, we are proposing also to offer
> > > commit/push
> > > > > > access to Parquet committers who are working on the C++ code base and
> > > > > > who are not already Arrow committers. The Arrow PMC may choose to
> > > make
> > > > > > such individuals Arrow committers based on the merit of their
> > > > > > contributions to Apache Arrow in particular.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have already undertaken the preparatory work to demonstrate what
> > > the
> > > > > > unified repo + build looks like
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/2453
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1: In favor of implementing the proposed monorepo plan and
> > > > > > offering push access to Parquet C++ committers
> > > > > > [ ] +0: . . .
> > > > > > [ ] -1: Not in favor because . . .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here is my vote: +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Wes
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/efdb7de9fd5f3e7d345caa85639ca6
> > > > > 5fa2c41f50a977b3eca959e9f9@%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > [2]:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/53f77f9f1f04b97709a0286db1b73a
> > > > > 49b7f1541d8f8b2cb32db5c922@%3Cdev.parquet.apache.org%3E
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >