[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [CI] Code coverage reports

hi Antoine,

I also prefer codecov.io, but unfortunately Apache Infra does not
support it I believe due to some app hook permissions issue (there are
some similar problems preventing CircleCI from being made available to
Apache projects). I have asked before, you are welcome to open an
INFRA ticket to ask again. I spent quite a bit of time fiddling with
coveralls and couldn't get it working; I was hoping someone else would
pick it up in the meantime.

I suggest we consider creating nightly coverage reports on codecov.io
as part of our task automation work already under way (where does this
work stand? should we sync on the separate e-mail thread about this)
-- if we enable jobs to be run outside of the apache/ GitHub
organization then we can control the available applications, like

- Wes

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Antoine Pitrou <antoine@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> Previous efforts to gather and publish C++ code coverage using the free
> service provided by coveralls.io have stalled (see ARROW-27).
> I went ahead and experimented with another free service, codecov.io.  I
> got it to work with our C++ and Rust code bases.  An example report can
> be seen here:
> https://codecov.io/gh/apache/arrow/list/8804ab50118f46139986acc435d740cb536f08f4/
> The proposed changes are in PR #2023.
> The two platforms, codecov.io and coveralls.io, seem largely similar:
> they provide free hosting for code coverage reports, support a range of
> programming languages and code coverage formats, and display compute
> coverage changes accross repository commits.  I find codecov.io slightly
> more readable but that's just a personal opinion.
> Do people or the Apache project have a strong preference for one of
> those two services?
> Regards
> Antoine.