Re: spifly changes
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:28 AM, David Bosschaert <
> Thanks Ray!
> It looks good to me except for one thing. This commit
> https://svn.apache.org/r1836063 changes the log() method in the base
> activator to do nothing. I understand that this is to ensure that the
> framework extension has no external dependencies but that log() method is
> actually used quite a lot. (Just run find . -name "*.java" | xargs grep
> 'log(' and you'll find 24 or so references).
> I think losing those log messages may not be ideal :)
I'll double check, but I think the logging code was not even used, ever.
> Being a framework extension you don't want to have any dependencies going
> to the outside, but would it be an idea to replace those logging message
> with java.util.logging ones?
Perhaps. I'll check about this.
Thanks for reviewing David. I'll keep you posted.
> Best regards,
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 at 21:14, Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > @David Bosschaert, et al,
> > Could you take a look at the changes I made for
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARIES/issues/ARIES-1814 ?
> > Basically, I changed the logic that correlated the woven imported package
> > back to the extender, which previously used package attributes. I
> > it with "uses" constraints on the osgi.extender capability:
> > e.g.
> > >
> > osgi.extender;osgi.extender=osgi.serviceloader.processor;
> > which assures the imported package `org.apache.aries.spifly` must come
> > the extender. Make sense?
> > --
> > *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
> > (@rotty3000)
> > Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
> > (@Liferay)
> > Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
> > (@OSGiAlliance)
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)