OSDir


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Aries parent pom


@Ray: Yes, it is optional for subprojects to use newer parent pom.

What's more I also propose to bump to the newest apache super pom (14 ->
20)(https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache/apache)

śr., 11 lip 2018 o 20:45 Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@xxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):

> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Dominik Przybysz <alien11689@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I would like to release aries parent pom with version 2.1.0 in a few
> days.
> >
> > What's changed?
> > https://github.com/apache/aries/commit/9e95cb9feb2e047198188
> > c34869a056f942ef8b8
> > https://github.com/apache/aries/commit/90db87e974b6665804a6b
> > 5154a591ff0125e9b9a
> >
> >
> The only change to parent is the first commit right? Which looks fine to
> me.
>
>
> > I've checked this version with blueprint plugin subtree and it works
> fine.
> >
> > But before that maybe we can switch to java 8? Currently aries uses
> version
> > 6 or 7.
> >
> > What do you think about:
> > 1) release of parent pom?
> > 2) bumping java version to 8?
> >
>
> Provided that subprojects opt-in to it, right?
>
> If so, I'm also fine with upping to Java 8.
>
> - Ray
>
>
> >
> > --
> > Pozdrawiam / Regards,
> > Dominik Przybysz
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>  (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
>  (@Liferay)
> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
> (@OSGiAlliance)
>


-- 
Pozdrawiam / Regards,
Dominik Przybysz