[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: junitlauncher task - support for system properties in a non-forked execution

Hi Stefan,

On 22/08/18 12:00 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2018-08-16, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> However, I would like some inputs on whether such support for setting
>> the system properties in a non-forked execution should be at the
>> junitlauncher task level or whether it should be configured within
>> each <test> and <testclasses> level. Or should we allow it to
>> configured at the task level as well as the individual
>> <test>/<testclasses> level?
>> junit task currently does it only at the task level.
> If you really need to have different env variables for different tests
> then I think the effort of configuring this properly isn't much less
> than having to configure two instances of the junitlaucher task. IMHO
> setting them at the task level should be enough, at least until anybody
> makes a good case for more granular control.

That's a good point. I think that will also make the implementation of
this task much simpler.

I won't add the sysproperty support for non-forked mode now and let
users try it out in the forked mode. As you note, only if there's some
real usecase/request for supporting this in non-forked mode, I will
revisit the feature. Thank you for your inputs.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx