Re: Airflow 1.10 Migration Duration
Thank you Taylor, the db-cleanup DAG is very nice! Got a question for you,
should we expect the DB migration to be backward compatible, i.e. would
1.8.x cluster run fine with upgraded DB?
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 6:14 PM Taylor Edmiston <tedmiston@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I haven't done 1.8.x to 1.10.x in one go, but multiple hours seems long for
> running a handful of Alembic migrations on 10M rows. It might be worth
> noting if you're using MySQL or Postgres and how your db is hosted... I
> wonder if there's a bottleneck at play here.
> Also, are you running the migrations in online or offline mode?
> You may see a performance improvement if you collapse all migrations into
> one then apply that (https://stackoverflow.com/a/34492022/149428).
> I prefer to keep all of my metadata in place personally, but the db-cleanup
> DAG in https://github.com/teamclairvoyant/airflow-maintenance-dags has
> brought up before.
> *Taylor Edmiston*
> Blog <https://blog.tedmiston.com/> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/tedmiston/> | Stack Overflow
> <https://stackoverflow.com/users/149428/taylor-edmiston> | Developer Story
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Sid Anand <sanand@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I checked with our Ops guy and he mentioned that when he upgraded from
> > 1.8.x to 1.9.x, it took a few seconds. We had 3M rows in the
> > table and run MySQL 5.7.
> > -s
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:54 PM Matt Davis <jiffyclub@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Here at Clover we're excitedly migrating to Airflow 1.10 (thanks for
> > > everyone's hard work on that!). We're finding that it's taking about 2
> > > hours to apply all the migrations to go from Airflow 1.8 to 1.10,
> > > driven by the 10 million rows in our task_instance table. That got us
> > > wondering what kind of maintenance people do on their Airflow metadata
> > > databases. Do folks mostly put up with long migrations and generally
> > longer
> > > queries, or are y'all doing periodic cleanups of your metadata DB to
> > > it fairly light?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matt Davis
> > >