OSDir


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.1 (3rd respin)


+1

*built and run some tests

Il giorno mer 6 giu 2018 alle ore 16:45 Timothy Bish <tabish121@xxxxxxxxx>
ha scritto:

> On 06/04/2018 08:35 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.1 release. This
> > is the 3rd Respin and I have fixed the previous issues encountered.
> >
> >
> > This is a micro release, with bug fixes only, where I would like to
> > highlight these fixes:
> >
> > [ARTEMIS-1568] Expired Messages were not transversing clustering
> redistribution.
> >   (this could affect other queues beyond the Expiry as well)
> >
> > [ARTEMIS-1872]Check for queue exists before creating shared queue
> >
> > [ARTEMIS-1902] Message redistribution is not stopped when consumers
> > count on remote node reaches 0 (AMQP)
> >
> >
> >
> > The full JIRA report is here:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12343356
> >
> >
> > The git commit report is here:
> > http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/commit-report-2.6.1.html
> >
> > (notice this report is not indexed on the website yet, I will add a
> > link and update the report if needed once the release is approved)
> >
> >
> >
> > Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.6.1
> >
> >
> > The Maven repository is here:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1164
> >
> >
> > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> >
> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
> >
> > The source tag:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.6.1
> >
> >
> > I will update the website after the vote has passed.
> >
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.6.1
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
>
> +1
>
> * Validated signatures and checksums
> * Checked for license and notice files in the archives
> * built from source and ran some of the integration tests
> * used mvn apache-rat:check to scan for missing license headers
> * Ran some external examples against a running broker from the binary
> distribution.
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
>